Grading AP submissions 2
Submission 1 Grading
| Row # | Row Name | Score | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| Row 1 | Program Purpose and Function | 0/1 | explains purpose but does not show functionality, actual actions of code |
| Row 2 | Data Abstraction | 0/1 | does not contain code segments that show how data is stored |
| Row 3 | Managing Complexity | 0/1 | does not conatin code segments that show how complexity is managed |
| Row 4 | Procedural Abstraction | 1/1 | all criteria is met, shows and explains procedure with code |
| Row 5 | Algorithm Implementation | 0/1 | contains sequencing, iteration, and selection with code but lacks depth in explanation |
| Row 6 | Testing | 1/1 | shows two calls, their conditions, and their results |
Submission 2
| Row # | Row Name | Score | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| Row 1 | Program Purpose and Function | 1/1 | all criteria is met, shows input, output in video and explains in writing |
| Row 2 | Data Abstraction | 1/1 | all criteria is met, explains lists used in code and identifies/explains variables, describes what variables mean in program, |
| Row 3 | Managing Complexity | 1/1 | all criteria is met, shows code segment , explains how it manages complexity |
| Row 4 | Procedural Abstraction | 1/1 | all criteria is met, shows two code segments with procedure and call, contribution to overall funcitonality |
| Row 5 | Algorithm Implementation | 1/1 | all criteria is met, algorithm shown includes sequencing, selection, and iteration in deatiled steps |
| Row 6 | Testing | 1/1 | all criteria is met, describes two unique procedure calls and what the procedure does, result of each call |
Discrepancy: none
Submission 3
| Row # | Row Name | Score | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| Row 1 | Program Purpose and Function | 0/1 | The explanation describes the purpose but not function of the program |
| Row 2 | Data Abstraction | 1/1 | all criteria is met, explains lists used in code and identifies/explains variables, describes what variables mean in program |
| Row 3 | Managing Complexity | 1/1 | all criteria is met, shows firstCharacterlist list, explains how it manages complexity |
| Row 4 | Procedural Abstraction | 1/1 | all criteria is met, shows two code segments with procedure and call, contribution to overall funcitonality |
| Row 5 | Algorithm Implementation | 1/1 | all criteria is met, algorithm "findwinner" shown explains sequencing, selection, and iteration in deatil |
| Row 6 | Testing | 1/1 | all criteria is met, describes two unique procedure calls with two different characrter pairs and what the procedure does, result of each call |
Discrepancy: none
Submission 4
| Row # | Row Name | Score | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| Row 1 | Program Purpose and Function | 1/1 | all criteria is met, shows different letter inputs like f, r, a in video and explains in writing |
| Row 2 | Data Abstraction | 0/1 | shows variable/name of list and append action in code, but does not show actual list |
| Row 3 | Managing Complexity | 1/1 | all criteria is met, proves complexity management with explanation and code segments |
| Row 4 | Procedural Abstraction | 1/1 | all criteria is met, explains function isitcorrect with parameters and how it contributes to program |
| Row 5 | Algorithm Implementation | 1/1 | all criteria is met, algorithm shown includes sequencing, selection, and iteration, and explains in detail |
| Row 6 | Testing | 0/1 | all criteria is met, states two unique procedure calls and what the procedure does but does not state specific call in context of code/program |
Discrepancy: In Row 3, the student shows how the code manages complexity but does not explain it in words.